“Barbara West is married to Republican strategist Wade West” (look at her Wiki). Don’t you just LOVE the internet in these times.
IT IS SO EASY TO I.D. “CONSERVATIVE MEDIA BIAS”!
Some dopes are plastering the biogoshpere with crap headlines like ” Real Reporter asks real questions to Joe Biden”. The real heading is “Part-time reporter asks GOP planted questions to Biden during interview”.
I must say I loved the way Biden handled this lady. This is exactly the way today’s Democrats need to deal with Republican zealots who themselves are good at dishing but are not adapt at receiving. John Kerry’s inability to deal with “CONSERVATIVE MEDIA BIAS” in a similar fashion is what cost’s him the election. HE AND QUITE A BIT OF OTHER DEMOCRATS ARE SOFT!
But I must say that I love it when someone with Go Nads knows how to take the fight to Republicans who are really quite soft themselves. They just generally carry big bank account sticks that makes their bark pretty tough. At least before the Wall Street Bailout.
Anyway, take a look at the “softball” questions “Real Reporter”/GOP operative Barbara West LED John McCain’s interview with during it’s entirety on October 14, 2008:
Barbara West Interviews John McCain (10/14/08)
She followed this one up with the Biden interview:
And preceeded that interview with this one with Senator Obama:
Barbara West Interview with Barack Obama, Sept 12, 2008
Now I love it when the few Democrats who know how and when to give it back brings it home:
Republican media bias? Sounds like an oxymoron to me. He didn’t handle this woman, he got handled, that is why he canceled his wife’s interview. If he or Obama can’t answer questions like this, especially when Palin was hammered during the Gibson and Couric “gotcha” interviews, they don’t deserve to be elected. So there is a double standard now? Only reporters with Democratic leanings like Anderson Cooper, Wolf Blitzer, Roland Martin, Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, Katie Couric, Charlie Gibson, Tom Brokaw, etc are allowed to ask politicians questions? Urgh…
This retreat from the Press is a sign of weakness, something you have trouble seeing. Don’t ignore it, world leaders like Vladamir Putin won’t. They are waiting for the moment they can man-handle Obama like Khrushchev did to Kennedy in Vienna, and we all know how that turned out…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
Dude. Your blog name is “Clancop”. One is supposed to take your perspective seriously and with merit?
Question. Did you even bother to click on the Barbara West John McCain link to view the “tough” questions that she threw John McCains way? I’M ABSOLUTELY SURE YOU DID NOT.
Why? Because you, like Ms. West, has a preset agenda to cast the Biden interview a light that suits your agenda.
O.K., O.k. So, Couric asking Palin what magazines she reads is a liberal biased question designed to cast Palin in a bad light?
That’s the sort of liberal media bias your referring to? Those type of questions are too tough and are the type that are not asked of the Democrat candidates?
Babara West asked John McCain in her interview “WHEN” and not “if” he was going to go after Barack Obama about his connection to Acorn. She followed that question with another leading one that suggested that Obama has unfairly painted him into a certain type of box and “what did he/McCain intend to do about it?”.
I mean are you serious when you say that this person is not an example of Conservative Media Bias and those questions were not from her husbands playbook (He is a GOP Strategist you know). I guess you didn’t bother to click on Ms. West Wiki link either.
Gotta say that I LOVE your post/comment though. It’s SO easy to rebut a Republican’s perspective. BECAUSE THEY ARE USUALLY BASED ON LIES AND INNUENDO.
Keep it up though, because exposing them allows those who have been blinded by this type of rhetoric to see you in the true light of the liars lore. Of course, when I say “those”, I’m talking about those who have an open mind.
People like you, I hope you go down with the GOP ship.
Wow, the Republicans are pretty desperate with those “when did you stop beating your wife?” type questions. Trying to associate Karl Marx with the democratic party is quite a reach? As many others have already commented, our tax system is about wealth distribution. What is most amazing is how many believe that Biden got his “just desserts,” and how these hard hitting questions are signs of a reporter having cajones. Well, coming across psychotic is not the best indication that you have a creative mind.
Was that a crack at my name Regular Brotha? Do your research you ignorant twit…
Clancop? C Lancop… My name, that is my real name. This isn’t a KKK reference you moron. On that note, why do you support the party which supporter slavery, founded the KKK, enacted the Jim Crow laws and fought against giving MLK, a registered Republican, a national holiday? Look up Bob Parks, I am sure he could educate an ignorant “brotha” like you.
Lies and innuendo? Where on my page have I personally crossed that line? I back up everything I say with a credible source. The Barbara West question to John McCain was in reference to all the media attention ACORN was getting, especially from CNN’s Drew Griffin. Many critics of the McCain campaign have been questioning him on why he hasn’t raised issues like Wright, Pfleger and Trinity United, especially when Obama himself said these were relevant issues.
You can always tell a “Kool-Aid drinker” from the rest of the crowd, they are ignorant to the facts and refuse to even question their own candidates.
Pop quiz, how do you explain Obama’s relationship with Raila Odinga? He campaigned for a man who’s supporters killed 1,500 Kenyan Christians after he lost the election…
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/
Pathetic, downright pathetic…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
Checking out your site, I noticed that you sure do like using the word “twit”. And you sure do devote the majority of your posts to addressing the issue of blacks voting for blacks.
All one has to do is do a control F and search the word “black” and see for themselves.
Clancop, I think you got a problem with black people. In fact, I think you got a problem with the fact that Obama is black and is going to win this thing.
Oh, by the way, you say Kool-Aid-Drinkers don’t question their own candidate.
Tell me WHERE on your site you have questioned yours? (McCain/Pain in the Ass to GOP Aides I presume)
So. What flavor KOOL-AID do you like? I like strawberry myself.
You seem like the grape type? MORE LIKE SOUR GRAPES!
What’s down right pathetic is that you are trying to tell me that I should not vote for a candidate of a party that though they started that KKK, they happen to have a non-Clarence Thomas like (I bet you don’t have a problem with ole Clarence) black guy as it’s nominee; and instead vote for a candidate who voted against the Martin Luther King Holiday.
Now lets see, the KKK was created in Pulaski Tn way before my time.
John McCain’s decrepit ole arse did his dirt in my lifetime.
I take the Black Guy, a tax cut to go along with it and a mason jar full of strawberry KOOL AID there ole C Lancop.
BEAT IT CHUMP
I stick to the Larry Elder approach of not taking the politically correct “African-America”, but instead the straight forward “black”. Got a problem with that?
I got a problem with the fact that his economic plan, especially his desire to renegotiate NAFTA will kill jobs and plunge the economy into ruin. I have an economics degree, I think that alone gives me the background needed to have these feelings. I care about MY country Canada, and if Obama is elected, he is certainly drag us down with America.
Tax cuts? Those aren’t tax cuts. It is welfare and tax increases… Even Barney Frank is admitting this, all following Obama’s “spread the wealth” comment. Where have you been? They aren’t lying about tax cuts anymore, Obama himself said “well I don’t want to raise taxes, but I have to” to help the less fortunate. Welfare? That doesn’t work at all.
Those tax hikes, are on those with gross incomes of $250,000, ie, the majority of small businesses. Gross income, income before costs (revenue) isn’t a hard threshold to meet, but sure enough these taxes will kill jobs, kill small businesses, force many Americans to run “underground” and off the books. Add in the fact that he wants income-insurance and you have all the tenets of a socialist economic system.
Why is this all about race? What have the Democrats even done for you with all those votes you have given them? This is downright pathetic…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxhYampIl7A
Listen to what Alfonzo has to say, Geez…
I guess Howard Stern was right, forget the issues, you will vote by skin colour…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
I’ve been waiting to have a conversation with someone like you for a while now.
THE BUSH TAX CUTS THAT HAVE BEEN IN PLACE THE PAST 8 YEARS WAS WELFARE TO THE RICH. Quite a bit of the MBA wiz’s on Wall Street have economic degrees such as your self.
What does that prove? I’ll tell you what it proves. It proves the “get out of business way, lower my taxes so I can grow my business” rant is a farce. Well, the Bush tax cut lowered those taxes for this exact demographic and boy did the jobs pour in.
There has been a net decrease in the number of jobs for Americans under the Bush Administration. An Administration that has subscribed to YOUR Republican Ideology of “I’ll hire more people if you cut my taxes. NO. You’ll make more profit, give it the managers of the corp in the way of gigantic year end quarterly bonuses, and lay people off so that your stock can increase due to the fact that your quarterly report now shows that your streamlining actually produced higher profits on your balance sheet.
You mentioned earlier that you deal with facts. Well deal with those.
Or the fact that the Bush Tax Cuts that John McCain wants to make permanent has not worked. Period. If anything, it has eroded the tax base and contributed to the rise in the national debt.
I could say where I work, but I won’t. I like my anonymity. But I can tell you that I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT “Those tax hikes that are on those with gross incomes of $250,000, ARE NOT THE MAJORITY OF SMALL BUSINESS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as you say they are.
Your economics degree surely should allow you to come to grips with that fact. The vast majority of “small business owners” do not have net annual incomes of $250,000 a year! He’ll if they do, they should fire their tax accountants because they are missing out on some write offs.
YOU CAN’T JUST SAY SOMETHING IN A HARSH TONE AND BECAUSE YOU CLASSIFY IT WITH “I’VE GOT AN ECONOMICS DEGREE” THINK THAT I’LL JUST SAY, O.K.. HE’S GOT AN ECONOMICS DEGREE SO…
Oh, and because my vote’s for Democrats have got me nothing, I should just come on over to the other side just because?
REPUBLICAN IDEOLOGY IS FLAWED! THE PAST EIGHT YEARS HAS DEMONSTRATED THIS. WHAT IS DOWNRIGHT PATHETIC IS THAT THERE ARE MEN WHO CANNOT OWN UP TO THEIR OWN MISGIVINGS. PEOPLE LIKE BUSH/CHENEY/MCCAIN/ROVE ETC… These are your fearless leaders, not mine.
I actually can’t believe that the tone of your response is one that infers that essentially I am so stupid to vote for a Democrat.
See, that’s the way I feel when I see one of your types driving down the road with a “W” sticker on one side of the pickup and a McCain?Palin sticker on the other side.
WHAT FLAVOR KOOL-AID ARE THEY DRINKING?
YOUR pathetic for even insinuating that ANY Republican is a good choice for the Presidency after the past 8 year.
Okay, for you since you don’t get it. The Bush tax cuts created four years of solid and steady job growth, Larry Elder said this on his interview with Larry King, even Julia A. Seymour of the Business & Media Institute wrote about this…
http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2007/20070905135730.aspx
Since you definitely aren’t a smart “brotha” like Bob Parks, Larry Elder or Juan Williams, I will explain this in simple terms. It all goes back to operating costs…
Revenue how much a company brings in before costs, which includes paying workers, paying for the cost of materials and taxes (basic operating costs incurred by all business). Profit, money after costs, is reinvesting in capital (new factories, machines, trucks, etc), used to pay higher wages, hire new workers, etc The more money a company is able to keep, the more money can be reinvested, the more money can be paid to workers, the more workers a company can hire. This is simple economics…
Profit = Revenue – Costs
Now, you increase costs, by implementing a higher corporate tax for example, profits are reduced. Now, businesses are out to make the most money they can, so by cutting profits, the government is forcing them to make cuts to their staff, staff wages, etc With higher costs, businesses also lack the funds needs to grow. Once again, the more a business can reinvest, the more it can grow, the more people can be hired. This is what is meant by “prosperity trickling down”, something Obama refuses to believe.
No surprise, he still refuses to admit the surge worked in Iraq, but let’s move on…
As the Business & Media Institute reported, there was 8.3 million jobs created in America since the Bush tax cuts were implemented. This slowed down as Democrats ran Congress, and the economy, into the ground. Instead of keeping gas prices in check, as Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and other said they would in 2006, they allowed for skyrocketing prices at the pumps, and when an economy runs on gas, this drives up the price of everything. Prices go up because costs go up, and when costs go up, jobs are lost. Blame Congress, blame the Senate, but don’t blame President Bush, he doesn’t have the authority those two political bodies possess.
Now once again, Obama’s tax plan is welfare and wealth redistribution. Small business and people who make $250,000 gross income, what is brought in before taxes (revenue in a sense), are going to be hit, and that is far more people than Obama will let on. For example, let’s say your folks make an upper middle class income. Father “brotha” brings home $160,000 from his position within the government, and Mother “brotha” brings home $90,000 from her small business, selling flowers for special events, together they pull in $250,000, and are now considered rich under Obama’s plan. That is before taxes, before tuition payments, before health care payments, before making car payments, etc
Well your money now goes to some family that doesn’t work. That is wealth distribution. You are paying for that guy who lost his job as a store manager and took a part-time one at McDonalds, under Obama’s plan, your parents are now paying for his change in income, income insurance. Why does he want to get a better job when he will make what he used to make for less hours?
Those who don’t pay taxes, well instead of getting a tax break, they are sent a check in the mail, paid for by your parents, that’s welfare. 95% of the population doesn’t pay income tax, and even the payroll tax they do pay, is pretty much refunded when taxes are calculated at the end of the year. After all this “smoke and mirrors” what you have it 2/3 paying taxes, no where near the number Obama claims. The problem is though, 2/3 of tax payers can’t pay for all this, so that $250,000 tax ceiling is brought down to cover these new costs, let’s say to $200,000, then to $180,000, then lower…
Ask yourself too, how can it be 8 years of Republican control when the Democrats have control both Congress and the Senate since 2006? Clinton did well thanks to tax cuts Reagan imposed which generated wealth that was passed down to him. Bill took over an economy in an economic expansion, an expansion brought on by Reagan’s tax cuts, allowing for business growth. Tom Delay and Republicans prevented much of Clinton’s spending promises, thus prevent an early recession. George Bush, on the other hand, was given America as it was sliding into a recession (the economy goes up and down all the time, but you try to keep expansions lasting longer and try to shorten recessions through market manipulation). The IT bubble bust in Bush’s first year, crashing markets around the world. You then had 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, a housing market collapse (brought on by Democrat greed) which brings us to the situation we are in now…
Do the research, actually educate yourself instead of simply parroting Obama’s talking points.
http://clancop.wordpress.com
I’ll use a quote from your idol to point out your inaccuracies.
“There you go again”
You said:
“Okay, for you since you don’t get it. The Bush tax cuts created four years of solid and steady job growth, Larry Elder said this on his interview with Larry King, even Julia A. Seymour of the Business & Media Institute wrote about this…”
My statement was that the Bush tax cuts have not created ANY net increase of jobs. This is FACT. YOU can’t spin it. No matter how much you try, YOU can’t do it. The facts support this.
You sir, are a spin artist. But your tires are flat. Next your going to tell me that the Democrats are to blame for the current mess we are in because they had control over congress with the slimmest of margins.
This is another fact. Everyone knows that the Republicans can block anything they want with the type of partisan margins there are now in congress.
Just because Larry Elder or Julia A. Seymour says something doesn’t mean it’s accurate.
The Bush tax cut, (the basis of your fiscal ideology) has DEMONSTRATED THAT IT IS FLAWED!
http://mediamatters.org/items/200810020012
I take the Democrat guy when it comes to comparing a Democrat (the Clinton Years) vs. your guy Dupya years.
http://www.ppionline.org/ndol/print.cfm?contentid=252964
You just can’t say something and make it so just because you think is so.
Remember the fact that a black guy, a black guy, is about to be nominated for President.
You think those who’ve implemented your ideology under the Bush Administration have not paved the way for this with their performance the past 8 years?
You’d never admit it.
This is precisely why Obama has a chance to win. The white working class is tired of falling for rhetoric like yours but continue to see their jobs shipped to India or China by their company heads who they themselves know are Republicans who prescribe to the ideology that you are defending.
The proof is in the numbers. C. Lancop…
You can call me all the names you want. I’ve got pretty thick skin. In fact, I will make sure that I post everyone of your insults just to show people the bullying tactic the Right tries to use and show them how you DEAL WITH THEM.
C. Lancop. I got a question for ya. (Palinish)
I’d like to know in your own words what things you feel the Republican Party has gotten wrong the past 8 years?
Net Job creation? You must be crazy… Where are these numbers you point out that state that the job growth reported on by Julia A Seymour for the Business and Media Institute. This was solid job growth, 8.3 million news jobs, and even with 5.1% unemployment, that is still pretty impressive. Clinton has 5.4% unemployment under his presidency, but you don’t see people talking about that do you?
The IT collapse cost thousands of jobs on both sides of the border, 9/11 didn’t just kill 3000, it sank business through uncertainty which cost thousands of jobs, Hurricane Katrina destroyed the economy of New Orleans, etc For you to quote Media Matters shows you don’t know what you are talking about. Even the article discusses a loss of revenue, not jobs, but even then the experts can’t agree,
Washington Post editorial, Jim Nussle, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, told reporters, “Some say that [the tax cut] was a total loss. Some say they totally pay for themselves. It’s neither extreme.”
You can’t spin loss of government revenue, which can’t be agreed upon, and claim it means a loss of jobs throughout the economy. That is the truth, that is what Seymour wrote, that is what many, including Elder have said, and it is what I am sticking too because it is a fact.
What do I disagree with for 8 years on Bush in the White House? Very little…
He enacted the Amber Alert system which John Walsh pioneered, something Bill Clinton refused to look at. Thanks to it, police don’t wait 48 hours to start looking for missing children.
The Bush tax cuts have created 8.3 million new jobs. I believe he should have gone farther, I believe he should have reduced government spending and maybe shot for far lower corporate taxes which would attract business to America and not scare it off. Why do you think people are sending jobs to Canada and Ireland? Lower costs to operate…
I disagree with his handling of the Iraq War, while the banner on the Aircraft carrier of “Mission Accomplished” boosted moral, Democrats have been using it against him from that day on. Journalists with alterior motives have also used this as a weapon against the administration. The MSM is used by America’s enemies to rally troops against ours…
“What we still don’t understand is why you Americans stopped the bombing of Hanoi. You had us on the ropes. If you had pressed us a little harder, just another day or two, we were ready to surrender! it was the same at the battles of TET. you defeated us! We knew it, and we thought you knew it. But we were elated to notice your media was definitely helping us. There were causing more disruption in America than we could in the battlefields. We were ready to surrender. You had won!”
General Vo Nguyen Glap, Commander, North Vietnamese Army
As for the surge, it was a great idea. He allowed for Generals on the ground to dictate to Washington their needs, and he listened, he didn’t allow for Democrats with an axe to grind to get in the way. He won in 2004 on an unpopular platform around an unpopular war, and many award him respect for not giving into for political gains. Did he mishandle allies? Yes, he shouldn’t have let France ramble on the way they did, that country has held a grudge against America for years for dictating European affairs, this incident allowed for them to strike back. He shouldn’t had let terrorist poison relations between Spain and America, he should have stepped up and done all he could to assist them and keep them on the battlefield. Thank God Nicolas Sarkozy is behind him. France’s new President has given America a boost on the World stage. If I were Bush, I would be tied to him like he was to Blair years before.
Domestically, he shouldn’t have let Blanco, the former Governor of Louisiana dictate to him and FEMA what could be and couldn’t be done. I don’t know how he could have done it, but he should have found a way around her incompetence to assist Hurricane survivors more quickly. Everyone likes to forget that he made four trips to the region before anyone else bother to care, well before Kanye West’s rant about how Bush doesn’t like black people. Why didn’t he spend time actually helping out, going there and working with officials, instead of patting himself on the back for a TV appearance?
He should have forced the issue of Fannie-Mae and Freddie-Mac regulation against the Democrats wishes. Seeing what has happened now, he should have acted more forcefullly in pushing something through against the wishes of Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Gregory Meeks, Barack Obama and John Kerry, all of whom were getting contributions from Fannie-Mae. We didn’t need for McCain and others to sound an alarm in 2005, this should have been handled after Clinton stepped out of office.
Do I have issues with Bush? Yes, I will criticize over spending, but seeing how he took up the Presidency in arguably the worst years of the USA since the Great Depression, I think he did a good job. Seeing how he handled 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, etc I think it goes to show he was a good man, might not have been the best President, but he sure wasn’t the worst. Jimmy Carter still holds that title in my eyes…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
“What do I disagree with for 8 years on Bush in the White House? Very little…”
W O W!
I’ve grown to learned that you can’t argue with an unreasonable person. And that sir is C. Lancop.
Then I guess I’m the ignorant little twit you called me earlier. How Rush is Right Limbaugh/Ditto Head of you.
You, Larry Elder and the other lady are certainly smarter than Warren Buffet.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36368-2004Mar6.html
NOT!
What do you want me to say? That I hate him, that he is a war criminal, that he is to blame for Hurricane Katrina? I don’t, he has steered America through some pretty rough times. Would I have done things differently? Yes, but not much. What is wrong with you?
I said what I disagreed with, I listed it out, and you somehow act as if I am marching lock-step with this guy. Put yourself in his position, ask yourself, with hind-sight being 20/20, what choices would you have made differently?
The Bush Tax Cuts? I would have gone farther. Not simply 15% for everyone, I would have dropped them lower, done what I can to encourage more investment in America, found ways like tax incentives for small business, whatever, but he did the best he could do with what he had. Real GDP growth of 4.4% following a recession is pretty good.
Ask yourself, what does Obama mean by “letting a tax cut lapse”? In 2010 when the Bush tax cuts expire, you will see a 15% increase in taxes thanks to Obama. On top of the “3%” he wants to add to business with over $250,000 gross income, he will kill economic growth. Explain that…
You are the unreasonable person here you twit. Those tax cuts were for everyone, and it is a matter of opinion to who they favour. Warren Buffet is an Obama supporter, what do you expect him to say?
Unreasonable and pathetic…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
There You Go Again…
You must have been called “twit” allot by somebody in your family when you were young.
Here you are referring to someone else as a twit in another blog:
http://meaningfuldistractions.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/news_joe_biden_barbara_west_2836/
Ask yourself “why” Warren Buffet is an Obama supporter. The greatest investor alive who knows FAR MORE ABOUT ECONOMICS THAN YOU is supporting the person you are calling a socialist.
I guess we’ll just have to see if he’ll kill economic growth now won’t we…
No, that’s right, IT’S ALREADY DEAD DUE TO YOUR GUY DUPYA!
You will now and forever be referred to as Twit Guy.
I use twit since other words I would like to use I can’t since I wouldn’t feel professional doing it.
Warren Buffet the greatest investor? Maybe, but nowhere does that mean Obama is. He is supporting Obama because he is a life-long Democrat, no because he believes Obama would be good for the economy. Are you that stupid?
74% of America’s CEOs believe Obama would wreck the economy.
http://www.chiefexecutive.net/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=67E20819CD7646C3B380AD60BB17EFAA
How stupid are you? The economy isn’t dead, the housing market is suffering thanks to sub prime lending, thanks to Fannie and Freddie, thansk to Democrats like Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and Batack Obama…
Your false appeal to authority shows your stupidity you twit…
Pathetic…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
P.S. Most of the CEOs who support Obama, feel the same as those in the survey. Many people are jumping on board the Barack bandwagon hoping they can influence him, keep him from tanking the American economy.
Once again, you are a twit, just like other twits around the blogosphere who is willing to swallow everything Obama says as fact.
Pathetic…
I hope the first bill that’s passed in an Obama Administration is one that bans “Clancop” from procreation.
The kid would grow up being called “stupid” and “twit” and other words you can’t say on this site whenever they do something C. Lancop, or “Twit Guy” doesn’t want them to do.
When they hit their teen years, god be with them. Teens are preset to disagree with their parents. God help the kid.
With your tone in my blog as well as the others I’ve seen you comment on throughout WordPress, your a pretty angry guy.
The way you deal with angry guys like yourself is to use your aggression against you. In fact, Republicans are great at self destructing. Why? Because of their anger or lack of control of it. (See youtubes of angry John McCain to get the gist of this. )
Bad is bad and good is good.
Republicans…..Bad
Democrats…….Good
By the way, it’s great that you can hide behind your keyboard and call people names. For some reason, you seem to me to be a short guy with a height complex.
[...] Barack Obama’s tax plan, siting my name as proof of the racist feelings I supposedly hold. Regular Brotha, one of these race baiters, [...]
Uh. your guy is the one using the Lee Atwater playbook. Not mine.
NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU SAY OUT LOUD, OVER AND OVER, THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE VICTIMS OF RACISM ARE THEMSELVES RACE BAITERS, THE TRUTH IS WHAT IT IS AND WILL ALWAYS BE OUT THERE FOR FAIR MINDED PEOPLE TO SEE.
HISTORY HAS SHOWN JUST HOW RACISM HAS BEEN A SCARLET LETTER ON THE LEGACY OF WHITE AMERICA IN THE THRONGS OF HISTORY. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.
THE NEXT 4 DAYS WILL DISPLAY THE UNDENIABLE “TEMPERATURE” OF RACE RELATIONS IN AMERICA.
IN IT’S RAWEST FORM! YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO SPIN IT. YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO “TRY” AND PLAY JEDI MIND TRICKS WITH THE HISTORY OF IT. THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING AND RECORDING IT. ABSORBING IT.
BY NOVEMBER 6TH, WE WILL SEE WHAT TYPE OF COUNTRY WE LIVE IN.
JUST REMEMBER, HOW CAN THE U.S. TELL OTHER COUNTRIES THAT DEMOCRACY IS THE CURE FOR THEIR ILLS WHEN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND IT’S FANATICAL SUPPORTERS HAVE STOLEN TWO STRAIGHT ELECTIONS?
I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT ON NOV.4, THEY WILL TRY TO STEAL IT AGAIN.
I HOPE I’M WRONG…
Stealing two elections? Scarlet letter racism? I guess we know who you are… The nutroot going to Michael Moore movies and Trinity United every Sunday…
Pathetic…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
Michael Moore’s movies made a lot of money. I am in good company.
Oh, and he hit the nail in the head on your boy Dupya.
And that glare on your picture is creepy.
You should change it if you want to actually convince someone to change their perspective. Or do you just like calling people twits, idiots and other words that you say you’d like to use but can’t?
I envision that somewhere in the background of that picture there is a club leaning up against something. You know what, your no longer “Twit Guy” Your the real life “GEICO Caveman Blogger Guy-Man…
Everywhere you see an Obama/Biden sign, I bet you get that Geico Caveman look on your face.
And your politics are caveman like also. On November 4th, lets see if your fellow caveman aged friend ( it’s you he’s talking too when he says “My Friends”) McCain can pull it off and take back to the economy back to the stone ages with “beat you upside the head leadership”.
Michael Moore is a fringe-left partisan hack. He got caught lying for Fahrenheit 9/11 (look up Fahrenhype 9/11), he bent the facts for Sicko (CNN’s Sanjay Gupta tore into him for that), and the guy has refused to allow taped interviews of him for paranoid reasons. He will only do live interviews, and only with those who he believes “superior” too. It goes all the way back to “Frank and Me”, he was lying then, and has been lying since. If you believe what he has to say, great, proves you are naive to the point of stupidity…
That picture was taken during work I did for an aspiring director. A young African man who put together a film for the Toronto International Film Festival. He got my name from a friend and asked me if I could do some work for him. The picture was taken after production with the lighting work. Creepy? You stare at movies, especially bad ones, staring people who can’t rub two brain cells together, who have serious money, but instead of helping others by “spreading the wealth”, they buy jets and lavish mansions… Ya, I am the creepy one in that group… yeesh…
How are my politics cavemen like? Socialism is as old as politics itself, and you are supporting it. We have seen how his kind of tax policy kills jobs, we have seen what countries with “civilian national security forces” turn out to be, we have seen what happens when you sit down with people who wish your country death and destruction….
You are honestly too stupid to understand economics, too stupid to see that “spread the wealth” doesn’t do anything but separate people from their money. China, Russia, Cuba, etc tried that, and you know who had money after all that “wealth spreadiing”? Those with power… Ask yourself, for those looking out for the little guy, why don’t they donate more? Both Biden and Obama make a considerable amount of money, but they give away very little of it…
So you are going to elect a man who wants to spread your wealth around and not his? Ya, sounds pretty stupid to me…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jjqjQgBOwSroIx_2idCauCVI-c5AD94671T80
You, grouchy guy.
Me, smiling guy.
Grouchy guy call people stupid.
Smiling guy respects those who disagree with him.
Grouchy guy morphs into militia guy, blows up federal building, ala Tim McVeigh.
Smiling guy make sure grouchy guy brought to justice.
Your losing it GEICO Caveman Guy. Take a chill pill. An Obama Presidency won’t be the end of the world.
Might spell the end of your ideology working as it has since Tricky Dick’s days, but you guys will have your time in the sun again. Geesh…
Actually it is usually “smiley guy” who becomes a member of a paramilitary group, like Tim McVeigh…
Matter of fact, expressed the same anti-American views shared by groups like CodePink. He believed in extreme freedoms and the abolishment of an “opressive” government system. Sounds very anarchist to me, not fascist…
What about Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn? Same thing. Barack Obama himself admitted his Marxist/Socialist upbringing, his time around “Uncle” Frank Marshall Davis, Communist and closet pedophile, his belief in the radicalized black power movement… You see him associating with Wright, Pfelger, Meeks, Farrakhan, etc
Oh and as for me being grouchy? Not so… I am just terrified about what an Obama Presidency means for America and Canada economically…
http://clancop.wordpress.com
P.S. The AP were also the group pushing all those vicious Sarah Palin rumours, and have backed Obama openly for the last month. Can’t trust a word they say…