Posts Tagged ‘campaign’

Stroll the South Platte Riverwalk. Imagine yelling “Your not the boss of me!” at Bill while standing in the Oval Office.

Denver South Platte river greenway

Could have been you. Had you won the nomination, that is.

Look to the left. Beautiful snow caps to the south of Denver seem so close. A look to the right provides the same vantage point Northwest of Denver.

Denver\'s veiw of snowcaps

Then, go slam some shots of Crown Royal in LODO like you did with the working class whites you were pandering to in Crown Point, Indiana. They probably didn’t even vote for you.

This is just the place to realize that what you’ve done to the Democrat Party is a low down dirty shame!

Lower downtown Denver

Now, come to grips with the fact that your hopes of becoming President are dead, forever. Any possibility of you being a factor in future politics is also dead. Why? Quite simply, YOU LIE TOO MUCH.

What have I done?

Thanks for extending this campaign so that you could expose yourself for the liar and race baiter that you are.

Just think, If you had dropped out after Super Tuesday, blacks would have never known about you and Bubba’s “Willie Horton” ways.

Your cabins contents (Maya Angelou, Bob Johnson and Maxine Waters) would have been effective campaigners in garnering the black vote.

Then, you would have won their support overwhelmingly in 2016.

Read Full Post »

How does this hullaba about Obama using the word “bitter” to (accurately) explain why people in small towns distrust the government and displays such distrust by favoring gun rights and religion, give Hillary an opening to gain on Obama?

Because the PRESS says so. They are pubbing this because it is Obama’s week to get negative press. You guys don’t see it. Last week was Hillary’s Bosnia lies and the Penn/Columbia Free Trade fiasco, so this week the press allowed Hillary’s claim that Obama was/is an elitist to make headlines.

This of course does not do justice to the fact that the more worthy news story this week was the reporting that Bill Clinton was paid $800,000 by a free trade group who supports the free trade deal with the Columbian government, back in 2005. What a whooper.

This speaks directly to what Obama was saying about people in those small towns being bitter as a result of the performance of the Bush Administration and also that of Clintons (because of NAFTA and the ACTUAL job losses in small town USA it caused ).

The press is surely charging premium rates to it’s advertisers because they know the advertisers know the press is playing the USA’s viewership like a puppet. I understand that a Hillary supporter would chalk this next comment up to me being an avid Obama supporter, but to be honest, Hillary shouldn’t even be in the race anymore.

If the press wasn’t interested in making money and instead more interested and focused on being a responsible entity (like they used to be before the FCC was watered down to allow the stock market to control the media), they would have seized on Hillary’s Bosnia/Mark Penn/Bill Clinton/Columbian trade deal that Hillary is “so called” against debacle, with the same fervor it did on the Obama/Rev Wright relationship. She would have had to drop out due to embarrassment at least last week, or the end of this week. Gary Hart style.

Instead, they dare insinuate that Obama’s “bitter” remark was worthy of more media scrutiny than this weeks latest Hillary snafu (Bill Clinton’s $800,000 revelation and her just laughing it off) following up last weeks Penns revelation/so called resignation snafu.

The great thing is, the internet has allowed the overall US population to become a little less gullible to this game as it was during Dubya’s two campaigns.

Read Full Post »