Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘race card’

What the people/voters feel is negative. The exit polls, you now, answers of particular questions from people who voted (since your asking for definitions) tell the story that more voters think the Clinton campaign, that means her and yes you, her staffers, are running a negative campaign.

You want examples? No before I post them, why is that you Clinton staffers/supporters think you can get away with asking such a question like “define negative” in the internet age we’re in? It’s so easy to slap you into reality.

Here are just a few of the examples:

  • the Clinton campaign has pulled a radio ad that quoted the Illinois senator calling Republicans “the party of ideas” and suggesting he thought those ideas superior to Democratic ones.
  • she mocked Obama and his message of hope and change in a very theatrical, over-the-top manner.
  • Clinton Campaign Disguises Negative Flier About Obama’s Health Plan As Product of Edwards Campaign
  • The 3am ad
  • The Clinton campaign is using robocalls to tell Pennsylvanians Obama is not the candidate for them.
  • Congressman Delahunt to address the Negative Clinton Campaign Mailer in Mass
  • accusing the junior senator of being both inexperienced and a talker, not a doer
  • Senator Clinton has suggested that Obabma is all about the “rhetoric,” not substance, saying “You can choose speeches or solutions.”
  • former President Bill Clinton implying that Obama was “not a patriot”

Google them. YOU CAN LIE TO YOURSELVES ABOUT YOUR CANDIDATE NOT BEING NEGATIVE, but it is what it is.

I haven’t even mentioned the Billy Boys comment about Obama’s SC win and Jesse Jackson, or Geraldine Ferraro’s Obama being privileged to be a black candidate comment (she was a member of the Clinton campaign at the time).

How bout this:

Does this help explain why THE PEOPLE think Hillary Clinton is running a negative campaign?

How bout this then:

An excerpt from scummy Dick Morris in an article written November 27, 2007, explaining “How Hillary will go negative”

November 27, 2007 — AS her once-formidable lead in national polls dwindles and Barack Obama moves ahead of her in the all-important Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses, Hillary Clinton will likely intensify her negative campaign against her rivals.

The Clintons’ political MO has always had a good dose of negative campaigning, especially when the going gets rough. There’s no reason to assume that they will alter their game plan now.

I remember Bill’s race for re-election as Arkansas governor back in 1990, when he found himself falling behind Hal McCrae, his unknown Democratic primary opponent. After Clinton’s 10 years as governor, McCrae’s attacks – featuring Daliesque stretched-out clocks tolling the time for him to go – were hitting home. Hillary decided to attend McCrae’s next press conference and engage him in a public, impromptu debate about his attacks on her husband. She gave as good as she got – and her foray marked the start of a four-week campaign of negative ads that brought McCrae down.

The Clintons used negative ads and attacks in each gubernatorial campaign – and, of course, in Bill’s two races for president.-

I can keep going if you’d like…………………..

YOU, CLINTON SUPPORTER/STAFFER, DON’T GET TO SET THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IS NEGATIVE.

Read Full Post »

“Clinton asks whoever is with him, “I don’t think I should take any s..t from anybody on that, do you?” Bill Clinton, you’ve been exposed for the a-hole you really are. You managed to JEDI MIND TRICK people into thinking you were “down” with them by playing the sax and displaying your chameleon like abilities in ‘championing black causes” while at the same time screwing (something you know a lot about) them by either signing legislation that was anti-black (welfare so called reform) or allowing laws that are clearly anti-black (Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act) to go unchallenged during your administration.

Now you’ve got the gall to act as though your appalled by ANYONE questioning whether YOU were using the race card when you linked Obama’s SC victory with Jesse Jackson’s in the past. You state that “I even put my presidential office (or whatever it is) in Harlem.

It’s in the re gentrified part of Harlem you fool. Don’t try and act like it’s across the street from Puffy’s restaurant or something. I hope the Boondocks makes an episode just for your trick a__ just like they did for Bob Johnson’s ole trick a__.

I’m pissed at the games Billary are playing. I expected this wholeheartedly from the Republicans. I have to say, I didn’t quite think about the racist wing of the Democrat party and how they’d go about and express their views or thoughts of a black president.

Screw the Democrat Party , the Republican Party, and to hell with a Libertarian. I’m with Michael Moore on this one. I support the revolutionary meaning of an Obama Presidency more so then Obama the candidate. This system needs to get a total re-haul.

From our products being pieces of crap to the revelations that our democracy can be bought (see both Dubya victories) leaves me pissed. THIS IS DURING MY WATCH!

The history books are past events revisited. WE ARE TRULY IN A PERIOD THAT WILL BE REFERENCED BY FUTURE HISTORY BOOKS. I DON’T WANT THEM MAKING REFERENCE TO THIS TIME AS THE PERIOD OF THE DOWNFALL OF THE USA!

If John Edwards was in the race instead of Obama, he’d get my vote. I’m sure Hillary would have displayed some of the same traits (her lying as_) in an effort to win at all costs against him. That surely would have given Edwards my support.

And just to think about the fact that I was actually considering voting for her (for I too thought having Bill back in the White House was not that bad of an idea for rebuilding America’s image abroad). I have now only come to see what the “pot calling the kettle black” Republican’s were saying all along.

That this guy is fake! HE MAKE’S ME WANT TO GIVE HIM THE FINGER!

Read Full Post »