Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘sexist’

It’s incredible. I’m really not surprised by this though. “Psst. He’s a black guy” is rearing it’s head. That crap about Obama would not have gotten where he is if he were a white guy is just that, crap. In fact, what very well might keep him from getting where he wants to be (President) is the fact that HE IS BLACK.

I believe now what Hillary was saying about “people kidding themselves about the Celestial Showers coming down on Barack” is coming to fruition.

The fact that Hillary’s very supporters would be willing to sound a war cry for people to vote for McCain over Obama is chilling. BECAUSE THEY DID NOT GET WHAT THEY WANTED (HILLARY FOR NOMINEE) THEY ARE REALLY READY TO CONTINUE LIVING UNDER REPUBLICAN RULE FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS.?!#$%

In-freakin-cridible!

Really, the ONLY reason this is happening is because Obama is BLACK. Period. IF Obama were a white guy, do you really think Clinton supporters would be saying “Vote for McCain” because Hillary was screwed? If you do, your full of you know what.

Basically, if all it took to get you fools to vote for McCain was to put the female Ted Nugent from Alaska as his running mate, I feel sorry for you and I feel sorry for this country if the “Maverick” wins and the Republicans remain in power in the White House.

Read Full Post »

Where is Hillary Clinton? Isn’t she the best person to hit back at the Palin Agenda that McCains campaign is waging against the Obama Campaign. I’ll say this. If she does not come out and address the Palin Bounce and meet it head on, Obama’s toast.

Clearly, she’s holding a grudge against Obama. Hell, for the matter, where’s Bill Clinton when it comes to commentary/takes on the Palin Agenda? It’s clear they are on the sidelines still smarting from loosing the nomination.

Obama’s got to take it though. He surely should have known that this was coming after not picking Hillary as VP, let alone beating her for the nomination.

For some reason, Billary seems like the “I told you so” types.” Letting the phony Palin Agenda succeed long enough to allow Hilary to set up the type of “political comeback” role I think she is plotting by letting the Palin Agenda go unchallenged by the only REAL “change minded/maverick” female politician, Hillary herself.

Read Full Post »

The McCain-Palin ticket is the phrase that reads the same backwards as Bush-Chaney. And no, there’s no “lite” attached. Except that it’s really “Palin-McCain”.

I’ve posted on this in the past and I’ll touch on it again. Americans, a vast majority of white ones at that, are serious gluttens for punishment.

Quite simply, it was the same “undecided” whtie citizens who voted for Bush during the second of W’s terms, who are now being swayed by Sarah “Smile” Palin’s addition to McCains ticket. This Palin “VPILF” crap appeals exactly to what McCains strategist are counting on. The immaturity of the American White Male that thinks with their libido and not with their brains…

Not talked about in serious context, George W. Bush is a perfect case study on the adolescent mindset of the 21st Century American White Male. Take a look at what types of roles/stars are revered by this segment of society in todays movies . Adam Sandler. Jim Carey. Chris Farley. Owen Wilson. Ben Stiller. Jack Black. Vince Vaughn. Will Ferrell. All White Males who play(ed) characters who have not quite grown up yet, though their clearly in their 30’s/40’s. These guys movies are all about connecting with this segment of the American population.

Fox News knows what makes these guys tick. Want their attention? Get it with a “hot babe” as your talking piece. Doesn’t matter if she has no substance. As long as she’s articulate, “hot”, nice rack AND there’s no internet dirt on her, she’s good to go. “We’ll give her the talking points and she’ll deliver the ratings… No experience par for the job needed.

Our media had the gall to criticize China for replacing the not so pretty 7 year old singer of the opening Bejing Olympics with one that fit their idea of what was pretty.

China’s official stance was, ““The national interest requires that the girl should have good looks and a good grasp of the song and look good on screen”

Where’s the medias criticism for the GOP’s 21st Century model for success: “The national interest of the party requires that the woman should have good looks, a good grasp of “Republican propaganda crap” and look good on screen.”

And Palin hits the spot.

As the Chinese replacement “lip synced” the words to “Ode to the Motherland”, Palin will speak pre-rehearsed republican propaganda about liberals, religion and taking America Back into a mic.

My question is; taking back American from who? Your own party that has F’d things up the past 7.5 years?

You can put lip stick on an elephant, but it’s still a big ole stinking elephant. Hows that!

Read Full Post »

Essentially, you are the type of person who would actually vote for George W. Bush TWICE if you believe the McCain Campaign:

  1. Decided after the vetting process that Sarah Palin had a 17 year old unwed daughter that was 5 months pregnant and concluded that she was just the quality VP choice needed for him win against Barack Obama.
  2. Knew that Palin’s daughters boyfriend and unborn child’s father, Levi Johnston, had a MySpace page that proclaimed he’s a redneck and “don’t want kids” and decided it was O.K. for him to keep it up and going well after the pick was made/announced.
  3. Decide to (and no doubt through Sarah Palins direction ) tell Johnston to abruptly take the cite down AFTER the press finds out about it and reports on it.

Quite simply, McCain shot from the hip on this decision. The same type of hip shot that Bush did when he choose people like Michael Brown to head FEMA. Or Benard Kerik to head THE FRICKIN DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

McCain nor his people in NO Way knew of these issues when they chose Palin.  I DON’T CARE WHAT THEY SAY.

Republicans are the kings of steer. They are briefing their troops on how to answer questions about Palin. If they bothered vetting Palin in the first place surely they would have decided that she was just too risky a pick in a time when they needed a home run pick. Plain and simple, they did a horrible job of vetting the choice. YOU CANNOT TELL ME THERE IS NOT ANOTHER REPUBLICAN WOMAN OUT THERE THAT DOES NOT HAVE THIS KIND OF BAGGAGE WHO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A BETTER VP CHOICE THEN PALIN!

Take a look at the product the GOP has put out as it’s finest during the Bush Administration:

GEORGE W. BUSH

MICHAEL BROWN

DICK CHANEY

DONALD RUMSFIELD

LINDA CHAVEZ

PAUL WOLFOWITZ

TOM DELAY

ALBERTO GONZALEZ

So many others…

These are the types of people we will continue to have placed in positions of the federal government that affect our very lives if John McCain is elected President.

Forget about Palin’s kids. It’s her political background that links her to the list of fools above:

  • Troopergate
  • Firing police chiefs because town businesses felt he was hurting their business ENFORCING THE LAW!
  • Saying she’s against earmarks when her time as Mayor AND Governor was/is marked by her lobbying efforts for and receiving earmarks.
  • Campaigning for and eliminating funding for teen pregnancy prevention programs and instead spouting off about “abstinence” is enough for teen pregnancy prevention.

Which brings me back to her kids.

Palin has made a political career of spouting off about how she is against abortion and funding in schools that teach teens about safe sex. It’s because of these types of stances that makes Palin’s 17 year old daughter being pregnant because she did not practice absitnence nor safe sex a ligitimate topic for voters know about while conducting their own “vetting” process in choosing who to vote for for President. The very center of the voter vetting process of John McCain now begs the question, “What was McCain Thinking?”

For some reason, Republicans refuse to understand that we are in the age of the internet. You can’t just come out with a press conference or have cronnies go on Sunday talk shows and successfully gloss over factual dirt that is reported on the internet like you could in the 90’s and earlier times. BECAUSE THERE WAS NO MYSPACE AND OTHER TYPES OF INTERNET MEDIA VENUES DURING THOSE TIMES  LIKE THERE ARE TODAY!

Read Full Post »

Obama is sexist. He’s an inadequate black man. McCain has more experience as a “President”. Obama is not experienced enough. Obama’s middle name is Hussein. He’s a ‘snake oil salesman”.

So…white Democrat voters would rather vote for McCain.

Ask the friend of Carol McCain about McCain (or read about it here):

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html

Now, look at yourself in the mirror and just admit who or what you really are. I don’t need to say it. You say it everyday when it’s safe to be politically incorrect.

Read Full Post »

Citing that Obama is sexist and uttering they would vote for McCain if Obama gets the nomination, begs me to ask white women , what are you reaaaly trying to say?

These are some of McCains sexist moments:

  • “Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?” McCain said at a GOP fund-raiser in Washington. “Because Janet Reno is her father.”
  • McCain stood by DURING THIS ELECTION SEASON while one of his supporters called Hillary Clinton a “BITCH” and did not speak out against it at the time it was uttered.
  • At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain’s hair and said, “You’re getting a little thin up there.” McCain’s face reddened, and he responded, “At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt.”
  • “You know, the French remind me a little bit of an aging actress of the 1940s who is still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn’t have the face for it.”

In the age of the internet, you can’t hide your true colors. I’d like for any of you to identify/name a sexist moment that demonstrates that Obama is a sexist.

THE REAL REASON YOU DON’T WANT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA IS BECAUSE HE’S BLACK! Period!

Read Full Post »